When
Where
To make decisions about drought declarations, status, and relief funds, decision makers need high quality local-level drought impact data. In response to this need in Arizona, the Arizona DroughtWatch program was created, which includes an online drought impacts reporting system. Despite extensive and intensive collaboration and consultation with the intended public participants, Arizona DroughtWatch has had few consistent users and has failed to live up to its goal of providing decision makers or the public with high quality drought impacts data.
In this talk Dr. Meadow will present results of a project to evaluate the Arizona DroughtWatch program (forthcoming in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society), which revealed several weaknesses in the public-participation reporting-system model including: reduced participation due to participants’ over commitment and time constraints, consultation fatigue, and confusion about the value of qualitative impact reports. Based on these findings, the study authors recommend that professional resource agency personnel provide the backbone of drought impacts monitoring to ensure that decision makers receive the high-quality, consistent information they require. Public participation in impacts monitoring efforts can also be improved using this model. Professional observers can help attract volunteers who consider access to high-quality data an incentive to visit the Arizona DroughtWatch site and who may be more likely to participate in impacts monitoring if they see examples of how the information is being used by decision-makers.